Introduction

In 2015, TREX composite decking was a popular choice among homeowners looking for a durable and low-maintenance deck material. This blog post aims to summarize the advantages and disadvantages of TREX composite decking based on user experiences from that year. We will address aspects such as cost-effectiveness, environmental impact, resistance to weather conditions, and overall satisfaction.

Advantages of TREX Composite Decking in 2015

Cost-Effectiveness

While the upfront cost of TREX composite decking can be higher than traditional wood, many users found it to be more cost-effective in the long run due to its durability and minimal maintenance requirements. According to a survey conducted by HomeAdvisor in 2015, the average cost of installing a composite deck was around $25 per square foot, which is slightly higher than pressure-treated wood but offers significant savings over time due to reduced upkeep costs.

Environmental Impact

TREX composite decking is often praised for its eco-friendly nature. The material is made from recycled plastic bags and reclaimed wood fibers, reducing landfill waste and conserving natural resources. A study by the Composite Panel Association in 2015 highlighted that TREX products use approximately 140 million pounds of recycled plastic annually, contributing to a cleaner environment.

Resistance to Weather Conditions

Users reported high satisfaction with TREX’s ability to withstand harsh weather conditions. Unlike wood, TREX composite decking does not rot, warp, or splinter, making it an ideal choice for regions prone to extreme weather. In a 2015 review by This Old House, TREX was noted for its excellent resistance to moisture, insects, and UV rays, ensuring longevity even in challenging climates.

Disadvantages of TREX Composite Decking in 2015

Initial Cost

One major drawback mentioned by users was the higher initial cost compared to traditional wood decks. While the long-term savings are substantial, the upfront investment can be a deterrent for some homeowners. According to a 2015 report by Remodeling Magazine, the cost difference between composite and wood decks ranged from $10 to $20 per square foot.

Aesthetic Limitations

Some users expressed dissatisfaction with the aesthetic limitations of TREX composite decking. Unlike natural wood, TREX offers fewer color and design options, limiting customization possibilities. However, TREX has since expanded its product line to include more choices, but this was a notable concern in 2015.

Overall Satisfaction

Despite some drawbacks, overall satisfaction with TREX composite decking remained high in 2015. Many users appreciated the low-maintenance aspect and the material’s resilience against weather conditions. A 2015 survey by Consumer Reports showed that 85% of respondents were satisfied with their composite decks, citing durability and ease of maintenance as key factors.